Crusoe Energy, an AI infrastructure startup providing cloud-based energy services to oil and gas companies, has raised $500 million in equity capital. from investors including Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, which is an early backer of OpenAI. Felicis Ventures, an existing investment is also said to participate in this round. This will expand the facilities that provide the infrastructure powering the AI boom.
The latest funding round elevates Crusoe’s valuation to around $3 billion, showcasing significant growth from its valuation two years prior. This surge reflects the increasing demand for cloud computing solutions, particularly in sectors reliant on AI technologies.
Focuses on neocloud industry
Founded in 2018 by visionaries Chase Lochmiller and Cully Cavness, Crusoe Energy has positioned itself within the rapidly emerging neocloud sector. This industry refers to a new wave of cloud computing services that leverage advanced technologies like AI, machine learning, and automation to provide more flexible, efficient, and scalable solutions.
Neocloud services aim to enhance data processing, storage, and analysis while addressing security and compliance challenges. This industry is characterised by its focus on offering tailored solutions to businesses, enabling them to optimise their operations and improve overall performance in a rapidly changing digital landscape.
How does Crusoe’s natural gas-powered solution work?
The core of Crusoe’s approach lies in its ability to take natural gas from remote oil fields and convert it into electricity close to the source, where it then powers modular, portable data centers. By doing this, Crusoe reduces the amount of methane released into the atmosphere, creating a more eco-conscious alternative for powering data-intensive AI operations. The startup’s systems operate in partnership with oil and gas producers, offering them an environmentally friendlier option to flaring and enabling the AI industry to tap into an otherwise underutilized resource.
While natural gas isn’t a zero-carbon solution, the approach has the potential to reduce net emissions by preventing methane from entering the atmosphere, which is a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Crusoe’s model, therefore, aligns with the growing ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investment interest while offering a near-term solution to the complex energy demands of AI infrastructure.
Key partnerships
In addition to the recent funding, the company signed a major deal worth $3.4 billion with Blue Owl Capital. This is aimed at financing the construction of a new data centre in Texas. This centre will later be leased to Oracle Corp, which has a deal to provide computing power to Microsoft and OpenAI.
What hold’s for the future of Crusoe Energy?
With its recent funding, strategic partnerships, and a commitment to sustainable practices, Crusoe Energy is poised for remarkable developments in the AI cloud landscape. By leveraging waste gas for data center operations, the company not only addresses the pressing issue of climate change but also meets the essential demands of a technology-driven world.
Environmental and ethical concerns: Is natural gas truly “green”?
The choice of natural gas for powering data centers, particularly for such high-tech purposes, is not without its critics. Some environmental advocates argue that reliance on fossil fuels—even captured methane—is a short-sighted solution to a long-term problem. While Crusoe’s system reduces methane flaring, it still doesn’t eliminate the environmental footprint of fossil fuels entirely, raising questions about whether AI development should turn to truly renewable energy sources like wind, solar, or hydroelectric power instead.
Crusoe’s defenders counter that using stranded natural gas is a practical, low-cost, and lower-emission option compared to the alternative—more flaring and more waste. Additionally, renewable energy sources aren’t always accessible in remote locations, especially where Crusoe’s data centers operate. Nonetheless, the debate continues as stakeholders weigh the benefits of this approach against the need for more sustainable, renewable solutions in the long term.